| about SCCP | upcoming events |
contacts | library | what's new? | partner economies |
links | |
about APEC/SCCP |
The SCCP, which reports to the APEC Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI), is charged with the mandate "to identify and pursue projects for regional enhancement of harmonized and simplified customs procedures; projects on enforcement matters related to trade facilitation; joint projects and linkages with business/private sector organizations related to trade facilitation; and projects which will contribute to the common development of human resources." In pursuit of these goals, the SCCP agreed to "cooperate with other APEC working groups and committees; APEC private sector groups; the World Customs Organization (WCO) and regional Customs organizations; other Asia/Pacific Customs Administrations; and relevant international organizations."
SCCP Vision
Statement
(June 1995, Sapporo, Japan)
"In keeping with the goals and directions provided by the Bogor Declaration of the APEC Economic Leaders to achieve free and open trade and investment in the Asia Pacific no later than the year 2010/2020, we, the Customs administrations of APEC, will cooperate in customs related matters, to the extent possible, and move to simplify and harmonize customs procedures to facilitate trade among APEC economies."
SCCP Guiding
Framework
(June 1995, Sapporo, Japan)
"In pursuing the above vision, we will recognize the different interests and diversity of Customs administrations in the region; recognize the importance of focused assistance and the need to pursue all opportunities for cooperation; consult with the private sector; coordinate our work with the World Trade Organization (WTO), WCO and other Customs fora, while avoiding duplication of work; recognize constraints in personnel and financial resources; and ensure that our work is focused and kept current."
SCCP Guiding
Principles (FACTS)
(February 1995, Fukuoka, Japan)
FACILITATION |
While ensuring proper enforcement of Customs laws and regulations, APEC Customs administrations should strive to improve facilitation of Customs clearance procedures. |
ACCOUNTABILITY |
Customs administrations should be accountable for their actions through a transparent and easily accessible process of administration and/or judicial review. |
CONSISTENCY |
Customs laws, regulations, administrative guidelines and procedures should be applied in a uniform manner within each economy. |
TRANSPARENCY |
Customs laws, regulations, administrative guidelines and procedures should be publicly available in a prompt and easily accessible manner. |
SIMPLIFICATION |
Customs laws, regulations, administrative guidelines and procedures should be simplified to the extent possible so that Customs clearance can proceed without undue burden. |
Summary of Direction
from APEC Leaders and ABAC
1996 APEC
Economic Leaders
DECLARATION
Recognized Customs progress in facilitating
the conduct of business in and between APEC economies, increasing competitiveness and
reducing transaction costs.
Directed APEC Ministers to intensify work in 1997 on:
1996 APEC
Business Advisory Council (ABAC)
RECOMMENDATIONS
Complete implementation of all customs
facilitation, harmonization and standardization measures by 2000, according to the
following intermediate milestones:
History of the Sub-Committee on
Customs Procedures (SCCP)
Since it was established in 1989, the Asia
Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) has evolved into a key forum, with the potential to
have a significant impact on the future of the Asia Pacific region. APEC took a
considerable step forward in 1994 when its leaders, through the Bogor Declaration,
announced plans to create a free-trade area by 2010 for developed economies and by 2020
for developing ones. APECs focus on liberalizing and facilitating trade and
investment has increasingly attracted international attention. At the same time, economic
development, technical cooperation and dialogue with business continue to be important to
APEC members.
SHARED VISION
Traditionally, international bodies use
negotiation and binding common commitments to achieve results. APEC, however, relies on
consultation to create a shared vision that members can implement in an individual,
non-binding manner. Since its early days, APEC has progressed owing to the efforts of a
number of committees, sub-committees and working groups. Among these was the Customs
Procedures Working Group which, in 1994, became the Sub-Committee on Customs Procedures
(SCCP), reporting to the Committee on Trade and Investment (CTI). The SCCPs mandate
is to facilitate trade by simplifying and harmonizing customs procedures.
Under the chairmanship of Japan in 1995 and the Philippines in 1996, the SCCP made great advances, resulting in some notable achievements. During Japans year, members focused on FACTS facilitation, accountability, consistency, transparency, and simplification, reaching a consensus on the SCCP Action Program in Sapporo in June 1995. Members agreed on a vision statement, a guiding framework and principles, a common action plan (CAP), individual action plans, and statements on technical assistance. The Osaka Action Agenda of 1995, which includes the CAP of the SCCP, serves as the blueprint for liberalizing and facilitating trade and investment to benefit business within the APEC region. In addition, the SCCP is guided by the private sector, economic leaders and ministers through statements found in the Manila Action Plan of 1996 for APEC (MAPA), a plan for carrying out individual and collective initiatives.
COLLECTIVE ACTION
PLAN
In 1996, the SCCP developed a comprehensive
framework for technical assistance and human resource development, providing a foundation
for implementation of the CAP. Canada and Japan will continue to be shepherds responsible
for implementing the APEC technical assistance framework. Implementation of SCCPs
CAP depends on funding from the APEC Trade and Investment Liberalization and Facilitation
(TILF) Fund, provided by Japan. TILF totals 10 billion yen (approx. US$100 million) over
15 years for APEC activities.
Under the leadership of the Philippines in 1996, an implementation framework for the SCCP CAP was established and coordinators identified for each of the nine items on the CAP work program. As host of APEC in 1997, Canada chaired three SCCP meetings and the helped expand the CAP to twelve items. Under the chairmanship of Brunei, Darussalam, the number of CAP items has been expanded to thirteen items, to include Integrity as an initiative.
During 2001, under the chairmanship of the People's Republic of China, the SCCP will focus its attention on developing an evaluation/assessment methodology for CAP initiatives. A new CAP initiative on Customs Business Partnerships was developed, bringing the total number of CAP items to fourteen.
LOOKING TO THE
FUTURE
In 1997 the SCCP formalized its vision in
the document A Blueprint for APEC Customs
Modernization: Working with Business for a Faster, Better Border . This document is
updated each year to demonstrate SCCP accomplishments with a view to seeking and
solidifying strategic partnerships with business.
SCCP members realize that certainty and speed in clearing goods through borders will lower costs to business. A progressive Customs Administration will have a beneficial impact on an economys growth, development and prosperity. Decisions to invest in new enterprises are influenced by factors such as domestic labour and capital costs; and an important consideration is the ease in which goods are cleared through customs.
Many economies have come to realize that a key factor of economic growth and enhanced trade and investment is the removal of barriers and the creation of a virtually seamless flow of people, goods and services. To truly reap the benefits that APEC promises, Customs Administrations need to work with business to develop a faster, better border one that balances goals of enforcement and public protection with goals of facilitation and competitiveness.
SCCP COLLECTIVE
ACTION PLAN OBJECTIVES
(CAP coordinators indicated
in brackets)
H |
ARMONIZATION of Tariff Structure with the HS Convention |
(Japan - TD 2002) |
T |
RANSPARENCY of Customs Procedures |
including Information on Customs Laws,
Regulations, |
S |
IMPLIFICATION and HARMONIZATION of Customs Procedures on the Basis of the Kyoto Convention |
A |
DOPTION and SUPPORT for the UN/EDIFACT - Paperless Trading |
(Australia; the Philippines - 2005-2010) |
A |
DOPTION of the Principles of the WTO Valuation Agreement |
(Canada; USA - TD 2000) |
A |
DOPTION of the Principles of the WTO Intellectual Property (TRIPS) Agreement |
(USA - TD 2000) |
I |
NTRODUCTION of Clear Appeals Provision |
I |
NTRODUCTION of an Advanced Classification Ruling System |
(New Zealand; Korea - TD 2000) |
P |
ROVISIONS for Temporary Importation |
e.g. acceding to the A.T.A. Carnet Convention of the Istanbul Convention |
H |
ARMONIZED APEC Data Elements |
R |
ISK MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES |
(Australia; USA - TD 2002) |
G |
UIDELINES on Express Consignments Clearance |
(USA; People's Republic of China - TD 2000) |
C |
USTOMS INTEGRITY |
(Australia; Hong Kong, China - on-going) |
C |
USTOMS - BUSINESS PARTNERSHIPS |
(Hong Kong, China; Mexico; Chinese Taipei - on-going) |
| about SCCP | upcoming events |
contacts | library | what's new? | partner economies |
links | |
| HOME |